Compute Integrity
Compute integrity is the ability to demonstrate that a computing environment is running the intended software on a trustworthy platform, without unauthorized modification, and that this state can be attested in a way that relying parties can verify.
What this site is
ComputeIntegrity.com is an independent, descriptive domain hosting a neutral observatory on compute integrity: vocabulary, public references, and governance framing for integrity evidence and verifiable execution conditions. It is not a product, not a vendor, and not an official portal.
Where it exists today (descriptive reality)
- Measured boot and chain-of-trust approaches that record integrity measurements.
- Hardware-rooted trust primitives used as building blocks (without reducing the category to a single technology).
- Remote attestation concepts where an external verifier validates claims about a device or workload state.
- Integrity verification expectations in critical deployments and assurance narratives.
This site intentionally avoids operational guidance. The focus is the category and the language that makes integrity evidence board-readable.
Why it matters now
- Resilience expectations shift the question from “is it secure” to “can it continuously prove it is not compromised”.
- Procurement and compliance pressure trends toward measurable and attestable assurance properties over time.
- AI deployment at scale makes execution conditions foundational for trustworthy outputs, logs, and auditability.
What this name can become
- A neutral taxonomy and vocabulary hub for compute integrity and attestation concepts.
- A reference index mapping how compute integrity is described across standards, guidance, and procurement language.
- A curated observatory of public resources and non-controversial frameworks.
- A governance framing layer linking integrity evidence to assurance, risk, and procurement narratives.
The asset is the domain name. Any framework, portal, index, or stewardship model would be defined and operated by the acquirer.
Resources (starting points)
External links are provided for reference only. No endorsement is implied.
- IETF RATS Working Group (Remote ATtestation)
- RFC 9334: RATS Architecture
- RFC 9335: RATS Evidence, Attestation Results, Endorsements
- Trusted Computing Group (TCG)
- NIST: Platform Firmware Resiliency Guidelines (PFWG)
- NIST SP 800-193: Platform Firmware Resiliency
- ENISA: Cyber Resilience Act (context)
- European Commission: Cyber Resilience Act
Portfolio connections (optional)
Compute integrity often sits beneath sovereignty, risk, and AI governance layers. These related assets may be relevant for coherent stewardship.
Acquisition contact
For NDA and acquisition discussions: contact@computeintegrity.com